Hi Claudiu,
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 10:56 AM Claudiu Beznea
<claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 09.12.2024 15:51, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Inside this block there are several return statements.
> > As we know DMA is not available when we get here, these do not
> > need to call rz_ssi_release_dma_channels() hence do not use
> > "goto err_release_dma_chs".
> > However, this may be missed when making future changes.
> > So perhaps it may be prudent to make this safer, by moving this inside
> > the failure branch of the rz_ssi_dma_request() check above?
>
> I agree! As this series is already big enough I would prefer to handle it
> after it is integrated. Keeping it like this doesn't impact the RZ/G3S support.
>
> Are you OK with this approach?
Fine for me!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
[Index of Archives]
[Pulseaudio]
[Linux Audio Users]
[ALSA Devel]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[KDE Users]