Hi Claudiu,
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 2:36 PM Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Use goto label names that specify their action. In this way we can have
> a better understanding of what is the action associated with the label
> by just reading the label name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for your patch!
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> --- a/sound/soc/renesas/rz-ssi.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/renesas/rz-ssi.c
> @@ -1084,15 +1084,15 @@ static int rz_ssi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> /* Error Interrupt */
> ssi->irq_int = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "int_req");
> if (ssi->irq_int < 0) {
> - rz_ssi_release_dma_channels(ssi);
> - return ssi->irq_int;
> + ret = ssi->irq_int;
> + goto err_release_dma_chs;
> }
>
> ret = devm_request_irq(dev, ssi->irq_int, &rz_ssi_interrupt,
> 0, dev_name(dev), ssi);
> if (ret < 0) {
> - rz_ssi_release_dma_channels(ssi);
> - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "irq request error (int_req)\n");
> + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "irq request error (int_req)\n");
> + goto err_release_dma_chs;
> }
>
> if (!rz_ssi_is_dma_enabled(ssi)) {
Inside this block there are several return statements.
As we know DMA is not available when we get here, these do not
need to call rz_ssi_release_dma_channels() hence do not use
"goto err_release_dma_chs".
However, this may be missed when making future changes.
So perhaps it may be prudent to make this safer, by moving this inside
the failure branch of the rz_ssi_dma_request() check above?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
[Index of Archives]
[Pulseaudio]
[Linux Audio Users]
[ALSA Devel]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[KDE Users]