On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 04:22:46PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote: > On 08/07/2024 16:05, Mark Brown wrote: > > git seemed to be able to figure out the context for 6.10 (I apply > > everything with am -3). > Oh, I read this just after I'd sent a V2. You can ignore my V2 if you've > got it to apply (it's the same patch but with a couple of conflicting > lines dropped from the context) Yeah, no worries - git seemed to cope fine.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [PATCH] firmware: cs_dsp: Use strnlen() on name fields in V1 wmfw files
- From: Richard Fitzgerald
- Re: [PATCH] firmware: cs_dsp: Use strnlen() on name fields in V1 wmfw files
- From: Richard Fitzgerald
- Re: [PATCH] firmware: cs_dsp: Use strnlen() on name fields in V1 wmfw files
- From: Mark Brown
- Re: [PATCH] firmware: cs_dsp: Use strnlen() on name fields in V1 wmfw files
- From: Richard Fitzgerald
- [PATCH] firmware: cs_dsp: Use strnlen() on name fields in V1 wmfw files
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] firmware: cs_dsp: Use strnlen() on name fields in V1 wmfw files
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/11] ASoC: Simplify code with cleanup.h
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] firmware: cs_dsp: Use strnlen() on name fields in V1 wmfw files
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] firmware: cs_dsp: Use strnlen() on name fields in V1 wmfw files
- Index(es):