On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 04:00:07PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote: > Don't take this. It applies to 6.11 but not to 6.10. > I'll try to sort out one that applies to new and old code, or > send separate 6.11 and backport versions. > Sorry about that. git seemed to be able to figure out the context for 6.10 (I apply everything with am -3).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] firmware: cs_dsp: Use strnlen() on name fields in V1 wmfw files
- From: Richard Fitzgerald
- Re: [PATCH] firmware: cs_dsp: Use strnlen() on name fields in V1 wmfw files
- References:
- [PATCH] firmware: cs_dsp: Use strnlen() on name fields in V1 wmfw files
- From: Richard Fitzgerald
- Re: [PATCH] firmware: cs_dsp: Use strnlen() on name fields in V1 wmfw files
- From: Richard Fitzgerald
- [PATCH] firmware: cs_dsp: Use strnlen() on name fields in V1 wmfw files
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] firmware: cs_dsp: Use strnlen() on name fields in V1 wmfw files
- Next by Date: [PATCH v2] firmware: cs_dsp: Use strnlen() on name fields in V1 wmfw files
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] firmware: cs_dsp: Use strnlen() on name fields in V1 wmfw files
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] firmware: cs_dsp: Use strnlen() on name fields in V1 wmfw files
- Index(es):
 |