On 4/2/24 11:20, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:
On 3/30/2024 12:09 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 at 17:20, Mohammad Rafi Shaik <quic_mohs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 3/27/2024 6:39 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 at 13:34, Mohammad Rafi Shaik <quic_mohs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Please turn off HTML mail composition and never ever send HTML email
to OSS mailing lists.
Now quotation levels are broken...
Add machine driver for qcm6490 SoC.
This initial supports which includes WSA883x Speakers with onboard DMIC
connected to internal LPASS codec via VA macros respectively and also
WCD937x based headset.
Add compatible for sound card on Qualcomm qcs6490 boards.
Granted that qcm6490 is similar to sc7280, is there any reason why you
can not use one of the existing sound card drivers? Like sc7280.c or
sc8280xp.c?
The qcs6490/qcm6490 has additional interfaces like MI2S, which requires additional machine driver modification.
Example : Required new DAPM widget change in machine driver for MI2S interface which is specific to qcs6490/qcm6490.
So, using new qcm6490 machine driver.
Will try to use existing sc8280xp.c machine driver.
What about sc7280? In the end, qcm6490 is sc7280 with different firmware / spin.
The sc7280 is tightly linked with realtek codec. which will only support for chrome.
Perhaps we should rename it and stop suggesting it's for all 7280-like platforms then..
The sc8280xp.c machine driver is more suitable for qcm6490, will use same sc8280xp.
This in turn, should it become something like snd-qcom-audioreach?
Konrad
[Index of Archives]
[Pulseaudio]
[Linux Audio Users]
[ALSA Devel]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[KDE Users]