On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 12:07 PM Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Is it a regression against the performance on 6.8? > > If so, what happens when you revert both this (587d67fd929a) and > beb45974dd49? That should make the timer code back to 6.8 code. > > > Takashi The commit beb45974dd49 boosted performance to 30%, but commit 587d67fd929a canceled this boost. I want to say that reverting commit beb45974dd49 returns performance to 83FPS [1] and this is sad. So I ask again is it possible to find a better approach than 587d67fd929a? [1] https://postimg.cc/xJMjkcHP -- Best Regards, Mike Gavrilov.
Attachment:
6.9.0-rc1-test-rev-587d67fd929a-beb45974dd49.zip
Description: Zip archive
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] ASoC: nau8325: Revise soc_enum structure definition.
- Next by Date: Re: regression/bisected/6.9 commit 587d67fd929ad89801bcc429675bda90d53f6592 decrease 30% of gaming performance
- Previous by thread: Re: regression/bisected/6.9 commit 587d67fd929ad89801bcc429675bda90d53f6592 decrease 30% of gaming performance
- Next by thread: Re: regression/bisected/6.9 commit 587d67fd929ad89801bcc429675bda90d53f6592 decrease 30% of gaming performance
- Index(es):