On 23/02/2024 16:47, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 03:39:10PM +0000, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
+config SND_SOC_CS_AMP_LIB_TEST
+ tristate "KUnit test for Cirrus Logic cs-amp-lib"
+ depends on ACPI || COMPILE_TEST || KUNIT
Should this not depend unconditionally on KUNIT rather than KUNIT or
some other stuff? ie
depends on ACPI || COMPILE_TEST
depends on KUNIT
or equivalent.
Now I look at it again, it's not correct. It's the ACPI || COMPILE_TEST
that is bogus.
+#define TYPESAFE_ACTIVATE_STATIC_STUB_PTR(test, fn_ptr, replacement_fn) \
+ do { \
+ typecheck_fn(typeof(fn_ptr), replacement_fn); \
+ __kunit_activate_static_stub(test, fn_ptr, replacement_fn); \
+ } while (0)
Should this be somewhere more generic in the kunit headers?
Damn, I meant to change this. I did a patch a while ago to fix
kunit_activate_static_stub() so that it worked but it takes a really
long time for kunit patches to end up in the mainline kernel. Hence this
was a temporary workaround. I noticed my fix has gone in at last but I
forgot to remove this workaround.
Can you skip this patch and take the others (assuming you are happy with
them) and I'll fixup and resubmit this test later.
[Index of Archives]
[Pulseaudio]
[Linux Audio Users]
[ALSA Devel]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[KDE Users]