Hi Rob, again
> > This is assuming there's just 1 port and 1 endpoint, but let's be
> > specific as the bindings are (first endpoint on port 0):
> >
> > of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(client->dev.of_node, 0, -1);
> >
> > Note we could ask for endpoint 0 here, but the bindings generally allow
> > for more than 1.
> >
> > I imagine most of the other cases here are the same.
I'm bit confused here.
You mentioned that -1 is wrong in previous mail.
Most cases are in the form of of_graph_get_next_endpoint(dev, NULL)
which is equivalent to of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(dev, 0, 0).
Technically, -1 instead of 0 is equivalent, but I'd argue is sloppy and
wrong.
But you mentioned -1 here, So, I will use it on next patch-set.
Thank you for your help !!
Best regards
---
Renesas Electronics
Ph.D. Kuninori Morimoto
[Index of Archives]
[Pulseaudio]
[Linux Audio Users]
[ALSA Devel]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[KDE Users]