On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:13:06AM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote: > Hi > > On 07/03/2014 10:06 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 09:57:39AM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote: > >> On 07/03/2014 09:52 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 09:39:53AM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote: > >>>> +static int tas2552_set_dai_fmt(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, unsigned int fmt) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + u8 serial_format; > >>>> + struct snd_soc_codec *codec = dai->codec; > >>>> + > >>>> + switch (fmt & SND_SOC_DAIFMT_MASTER_MASK) { > >>>> + case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBS_CFS: > >>>> + serial_format = 0x00; > >>>> + break; > >>>> + case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBS_CFM: > >>>> + serial_format = TAS2552_WORD_CLK_MASK; > >>>> + break; > >>>> + case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBM_CFS: > >>>> + serial_format = TAS2552_BIT_CLK_MASK; > >>>> + break; > >>>> + case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBM_CFM: > >>>> + serial_format = (TAS2552_BIT_CLK_MASK | TAS2552_WORD_CLK_MASK); > >>>> + break; > >>>> + default: > >>>> + return -EINVAL; > >>>> + } > >>>> + > >>>> + pm_runtime_get_sync(codec->dev); > >>>> + > >>>> + snd_soc_update_bits(codec, TAS2552_SER_CTRL_1, > >>>> + (TAS2552_BIT_CLK_MASK | TAS2552_WORD_CLK_MASK), > >>>> + serial_format); > >>>> + > >>>> + pm_runtime_put(codec->dev); > >>> I have a feeling it's better to just put at the end of the function. > >>> Remember your pm_runtime_put() will issue i2c transfers which can take a > >>> looooooong time ;-) > >> I thought about that but the next switch case could return if the format > >> mask is invalid which means the runtime calls would not be balanced. > >> > >> So I decided to wrap the snd_soc calls with the pm_runtime calls to keep it > >> balanced. > > it looks like you can do both switch statements outside of the > > pm_runtime region and cache results on serial_format and do a single > > write to CTRL_1 register (?). If not, then just use two local variables. > > > > Yeah I could probably consolidate these into a single call. And throw > a debug statement in the default case to why the format was not set. that'd be cool. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- References:
- [PATCH v4] ASoC: tas2552: Support TI TAS2552 Amplifier
- From: Dan Murphy
- Re: [PATCH v4] ASoC: tas2552: Support TI TAS2552 Amplifier
- From: Felipe Balbi
- Re: [PATCH v4] ASoC: tas2552: Support TI TAS2552 Amplifier
- From: Dan Murphy
- Re: [PATCH v4] ASoC: tas2552: Support TI TAS2552 Amplifier
- From: Felipe Balbi
- Re: [PATCH v4] ASoC: tas2552: Support TI TAS2552 Amplifier
- From: Dan Murphy
- [PATCH v4] ASoC: tas2552: Support TI TAS2552 Amplifier
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v4] ASoC: tas2552: Support TI TAS2552 Amplifier
- Next by Date: [PATCH v5] ASoC: tas2552: Support TI TAS2552 Amplifier
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v4] ASoC: tas2552: Support TI TAS2552 Amplifier
- Next by thread: [PATCH v5] ASoC: tas2552: Support TI TAS2552 Amplifier
- Index(es):