Re: [PATCH v4] ASoC: tas2552: Support TI TAS2552 Amplifier

[Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>]

Hi,

On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 09:39:53AM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote:
> +static int tas2552_set_dai_fmt(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, unsigned int fmt)
> +{
> +	u8 serial_format;
> +	struct snd_soc_codec *codec = dai->codec;
> +
> +	switch (fmt & SND_SOC_DAIFMT_MASTER_MASK) {
> +	case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBS_CFS:
> +		serial_format = 0x00;
> +		break;
> +	case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBS_CFM:
> +		serial_format = TAS2552_WORD_CLK_MASK;
> +		break;
> +	case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBM_CFS:
> +		serial_format = TAS2552_BIT_CLK_MASK;
> +		break;
> +	case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBM_CFM:
> +		serial_format = (TAS2552_BIT_CLK_MASK | TAS2552_WORD_CLK_MASK);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	pm_runtime_get_sync(codec->dev);
> +
> +	snd_soc_update_bits(codec, TAS2552_SER_CTRL_1,
> +			    (TAS2552_BIT_CLK_MASK | TAS2552_WORD_CLK_MASK),
> +			    serial_format);
> +
> +	pm_runtime_put(codec->dev);

I have a feeling it's better to just put at the end of the function.
Remember your pm_runtime_put() will issue i2c transfers which can take a
looooooong time ;-)

other than that, looks ok to me:

Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature