can this network setup works?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Greetings,

I have this setup.
host and two vms, a and b.
vm a servers as router, it has one physical nic passed directly into it.
I want to connect vm a to vm b and the host to provide internet access to both.
so I've created a virtual switch like this:
<network>
  <name>default</name>
  <uuid>f90b3044-81c1-4c22-98df-8bbca3153f21</uuid>
  <bridge name='virsw0' stp='on' delay='0'/>
  <mac address='52:54:00:6b:1b:92'/>
</network>

with this xml entry:
    <interface type='bridge'>
      <mac address='xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx'/>
      <source bridge='virsw0'/>
      <model type='virtio'/>
      <address type='pci' domain='x' bus='x' slot='x' function='x'/>
    </interface>
in vm a and vm b should connect the both to the virtual switch thus allowing vm b internet access.
this however doesn't solves the host connection to the internet.
reading docs points to the fact I can add new tun devs outside of libvirt and add it to the virtual switch.
so I did this:
$ ip tuntap add QemuTap0 mode tap user root
$ ip link set QemuTap0 master virsw0
and brctl show virsw0 returns this:
$ brctl show virsw0
bridge name     bridge id               STP enabled     interfaces
virsw0          8000.5254006b1b92       yes             QemuTap0

so theoretically speaking, when vm a is started and libvirt creates a device and connects it to the virtual switch and run dhcpd, vm a will provide ip.
am I correct?

Thanks,

Dagg



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux