Re: Public IP on virtual machine network issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The issue has been resolved I had a firewald running on virtual host.

Thank you for the replay.


On 2/13/2022 9:17 PM, Daniel Romero wrote:
Hi,

as Tom says, check iptables forward rules. Also, you can check host sysctl ipv4/6 global and per interface rules to double check bridge forward capabilities. Finally, check your routes on guest vm, especially the default gw, sometimes you can receive the packet and the answer is sent through the wrong interface because of bad routes.

Best Regards.
Daniel Romero P.



On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 7:39 PM Tom Ammon <thomasammon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Can you post the output of iptables -L? 

By default, the bridge module in the kernel sends packets traversing the bridge to iptables (in the FORWARD chain I believe) for processing. So if you have configured a DENY policy on the FORWARD chain, or are otherwise filtering in the forward chain, you'll be affecting packets traversing the bridge. Check out this page for details on how to change this behavior: https://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Net.bridge.bridge-nf-call_and_sysctl.conf

Tom

On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 4:08 PM Marcin Groszek <marcin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have been struggling with this for weeks and I was unable to find an
answer on line. Perhaps someone here can help me.

Oracle linux 8 running virtualization:

hardware node has a public IP address on interface bridge0 and physical
eno1 is a member of the bridge0

a virtual OS has interface bridged to lan and source is bridge0, Ip
address of virtual OS is also a public from same class as the hardware node.

I can route in and out of virtual, I can ping from hardware node to
virtual and vice versa, so the routing works as it should, sort of.

When I try tracepath or traceroute from outside to virtual I get !H on
last hup

same result when I try to do the same form hardware node to virtual I get !H

Also, when I telnet (TCP) to a specific port on virtual where I have a
daemon LISTENING OR NOT I get: No route to host. Same experiment works
just fine for ssh port.

Firewalld is not running, and I just have very basic iptables rules like
allowing external address block to ssh to hardware node and to virtual
dropping connections from all other sources

This issue presented it self when I attempted to setup a galera node on
virtual and ports 4567 is responding but 4568 and 4444 are not, but the
daemons are running and I can clearly see lsoft showing "LISTENING"

I capture the traffic and the tcp as well as udp are getting to the
virtual. Is there a preconfigured netfiltering that I am not aware of?

What am I missing?




--
Best Regards:
Marcin Groszek
Business Voip Resource.
http://www.voipplus.net



--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Ammon
M: (737) 400-9042
thomasammon@xxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
Best Regards:
Marcin Groszek
Business Voip Resource.
http://www.voipplus.net

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux