Moin libvirters,
I'm looking into the current numa settings for a large-ish libvirt/qemu
based setup and I ended up having a couple of questions:
1) Has kernel.numa_balancing completely replaced numad or is there still
a time and place for numad when we have a modern kernel?
2) Should I pin vCPUs to numa nodes and/or use numatune at all, when
using kernel.numa_balancing?
3) The libvirt domain xml elements for vcpu and numatune.memory have
placement options. According to the docs setting them to auto will query
numad for a good placements. Should I keep numad running just for this?
4) Should I still expose the numa topology via cpu.numa.cell if I use
the auto placement for vcpu and numatune?
5) Does the cpus attribute in the cpu.numa.cell elements reference vCPU
cores or the real physical CPU cores? Most examples reference them as
ranges, which confuses me as on my numa hosts node0 has cores 0,2,4..
and node1 the others.
I'd like to benchmark a couple of different options using our production
workloads once I actually have grasp what combinations could make any
sense. Maybe somebody would like to share the cpu/memory/numa settings
they ended up with and why?
Thanks a lot,
Patrick Meyer
_______________________________________________
libvirt-users mailing list
libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
