On Mon, 2018-10-15 at 11:46 +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 09:05:16AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > Interesting. What is the output of 'virsh capabilities'? > > In attachment. Looks reasonable enough. > > More interesting still is the fact that the guest XML you shared > > looks like an *active* XML, ie. one taken from a running guest... > > Does that mean the guest can start even though it's using the 2.11 > > machine type? > > No, of course it doesn't; the guest is running because I `virsh-edit`ed > it to use 2.10 machine type :-) Should have noticed that. Welp, I'm fresh out of ideas then :/ -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization _______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
