On Mon, 2018-10-15 at 08:21 +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 02:28:07PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > If I had to guess, I would say the <emulator> element of your guest > > is probably pointing to a custom-built QEMU 2.11 binary rather than > > the default one installed from RPMs. > > Your guess made me curious enough to check the remote machine one last > time before I went to sleep, but unfortunately the <emulator> element is > pointing to the plain `/usr/bin/qemu-kvm`, which in turn exec()'s > `/usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64`. > > (I attached the nothing-special, full guest XML.) Interesting. What is the output of 'virsh capabilities'? More interesting still is the fact that the guest XML you shared looks like an *active* XML, ie. one taken from a running guest... Does that mean the guest can start even though it's using the 2.11 machine type? -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization _______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
