Re: Attempt to define unprivileged LXC by libvirt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 02:28:11PM +0100, ales drtik wrote:
> Thanks for info about that.
> This means to use apparmor mandatory, isn't it true?

If you enable user namespaces for the container that is sufficient to provide
a secure config. None the less we still recommend /also/ adding MAC like
SELinux or AppArmor on top.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

_______________________________________________
libvirt-users mailing list
libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux