On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 06:44:43PM +0100, Florian Haas wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:07 PM, David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > We should certainly document what I have summaries here properly at a >> > central palce! >> >> Please review the three edits I've submitted to the wiki: >> https://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Special:Contributions/Fghaas >> >> Feel free to ruthlessly edit/roll back anything that is inaccurate. >> Thanks! > > I've made some minor edits to clarify a bunch of bits, and a link to the > Kernel doc about Intel nVMX. (Hope that looks fine.) I'm sure they it does, but just so you know I currently don't see any edits from you on the Nested Guests page. Are you sure you saved/published your changes? > You wrote: "L2...which does no further virtualization". Not quite true > — "under right circumstances" (read: sufficiently huge machine with tons > of RAM), L2 _can_ in turn L3. :-) Insert "normally" between "which" and "does", then. :) > Last time I checked (this morning), Rich W.M. Jones had 4 levels of > nesting tested with the 'supernested' program[1] he wrote. (Related > aside: This program is packaged it as part of 2016 QEMU Advent > Calendar[2] -- if you want to play around on a powerful test machine > with tons of free memory.) > > [1] http://git.annexia.org/?p=supernested.git;a=blob;f=README > [2] http://www.qemu-advent-calendar.org/2016/#day-13 Interesting, thanks for the pointer! Cheers, Florian _______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
