On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 01:09:14PM +0200, David Ayers wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 31.08.2017, 11:32 +0200 schrieb David Ayers:Am Donnerstag, den 31.08.2017, 10:11 +0200 schrieb Martin Kletzander: > > AFAIK the support for this was not added. Feel free to request this in > our bugzilla [1] so that we can track it. Or, even better, send a patch > if you have some time ;) It should not be difficult. Okay, I'll be sure to add it to bugzilla sometime soon.Actually, this was already reported (on the last day of 2010): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666556 and seems to restated (two years later) in: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824573 and by the looks of this, generic dhcp options at global scope are already contentious, let alone at host scope. So I guess we my stop configuring dnsmasq via libvirt.
Oh, look at that. It's good that you've found it. Of course there are people more proficient in the networking area who have way more thing on their radar. Looks like this is very often requested thing also. I can't speak for arbitrary options, but named ones that we know what to map them to, should be fine and not rejected (at least not right away). But others (especially Laine; Cc'd) could be more specific WRT your request.
Cheers, David -- David Ayers - Team Austria Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) [] (http://www.fsfe.org) Join the Fellowship of FSFE! [][][] (https://fsfe.org/join) Your donation powers our work! || (http://fsfe.org/donate)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
