On 04/03/2017 10:07 AM, Michael Hierweck wrote:
Hi all, virsh checks whether a (live) migration is safe or unsafe. When a migration is considered to be unsafe it is rejected unless the --unsafe option is prodivided. As a part of those checks virsh considers the cache settings for the underlying storage resources. In this context only cache="none" is considered to be safe. I wonder why cache="directsync" might be harmfull as it bypasses the host page cache completely.
That's a good question. I too think it isn't harmful. Maybe it's a bug in our code?
Michal _______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
