Hello,
I've created a routed network that forwards to a physical interface:
<network>
<name>default</name>
<forward dev='eth0' mode='route'/>
<mac address='52:54:00:f2:5b:4f'/>
<ip address='192.168.100.1' netmask='255.255.255.0'>
<dhcp>
<range start='192.168.100.10' end='192.168.100.20'/>
</dhcp>
</ip>
</network>
When this network is started, the iptables rules are associated with
eth0, as expected. However, the "virbr0" bridge interface that is
create automatically does not contain the eth0 interface. I have to
manually run "brctl addif virbr0 eth0" so the guests can communicate
with the outside.
I was under the impression libvirt would add the physical interface
automatically, based on the <forward> definition. Is it how it should
work?
Giovanni
_______________________________________________
libvirt-users mailing list
libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
