Re: Put virbr0 in promiscusous

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12.11.2014 14:55, Sagar Shedge wrote:
Hi ,


I have two virtual machines VM1 and VM2. Then I have added eth0 of  my
VM to 'default' network.

Use case :-
I want to monitor all traffic on virbr0('default' network).

Steps followed :-
1. Add VM1 eth0 to virbr0
2. Add VM2 eth1 to virbr0
3. brctl setageing ovsbr0 0 ..(To put bridge in promiscuous)

Now I am running tcpdump on eth1 of VM2 and trying to ping google.com
<http://google.com>(outside world)

In VM2 (tcpdump -i eth1), I can see only ingress(incoming) traffic of
VM1. I am not able see outgoing traffic of VM1.

If I create another bridge and trying same scenario with 2 VM then VM2
can see both ingress and outgress traffic.

So want to know what is the issue?
Is libvirt doing something different with this virtbr0 bridge?

I suspect it's a kernel issue. I mean, kernel takes several shortcuts in network stack when it comes to virtual NICs and virtual bridges. I've come across this when implementing QoS. I haven't tried your scenario out, I'm just guessing. BTW: depending on network type, libvirt may or may not set up some ip-/eb-tables filters. But I don't think that's the case.

Michal

_______________________________________________
libvirt-users mailing list
libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux