On 2014-10-27 09:31, Allen Qiu wrote: > Hi all, > > What is the difference between starting virt-manager by "virt-manager" > and by "sudo virt-manager"? It seems that there are two copy of > virt-manager running in the background. > > When I run *"virt-manager",* I got a error of "*Unable to open a > connection to the libvirt management daemon. **Libvirt URI is: > qemu:///system **Verify that: - The 'libvirtd' daemon has been started*". > > Whereas when I run *"sudo virt-manager",* I got a error of *"Error > starting Virtual Machine Manager: Failed to contact configuration > server; some possible causes are that you need to enable TCP/IP > networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS locks due to a system crash. > See **http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/**for information."* > ** > How should I deal with the two issues respectively? Is there any > drawback by simply running "virt-manager"? You should set up correct permissions for libvirtd (cf. libvirtd.conf, unix_sock_group) and use virt-manager/virsh as unprivileged user. > > Regards, > > Allen > > 2014-10-27 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Allen Qiu > > > _______________________________________________ > libvirt-users mailing list > libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users > -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, / Best Regards, Sven Schwedas Systemadministrator TAO Beratungs- und Management GmbH | Lendplatz 45 | A - 8020 Graz Mail/XMPP: sven.schwedas@xxxxxx | +43 (0)680 301 7167 http://software.tao.at
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
