|
Hi all,
What is the difference between starting
virt-manager by "virt-manager" and by "sudo virt-manager"? It seems that there
are two copy of virt-manager running in the background.
When I run "virt-manager", I
got a error of "Unable to open a connection to the libvirt management
daemon. Libvirt URI is:
qemu:///system Verify
that: - The 'libvirtd' daemon has been started".
Whereas when I run "sudo
virt-manager", I got a error of "Error starting Virtual Machine
Manager: Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are that
you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS locks due
to a system crash. See http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/
for information."
How should I deal with the two issues
respectively? Is there any drawback by simply running
"virt-manager"?
Regards,
Allen
2014-10-27
Allen Qiu |
_______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
