On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 26.08.2014 18:42, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote: >> >> >> 2014-08-26 19:11 GMT+04:00 Andrey Korolyov <andrey@xxxxxxx >> <mailto:andrey@xxxxxxx>>: >> >> not, right now it is not possible. Why don`t you want to just assign >> unique paths for socket name, derived, say, from VM` UUID? >> >> >> In case of unix domain sockets paths not problem, but i want to connect >> to each qemu-ga address from central point. I don't want to use socat , >> as i see qemu have ability to specify host and port and in this case >> qemu listens tcp port on this address. But in libvirt schema i can't >> provide host and port. > > > From http://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsCharTCP > > <devices> > <serial type="tcp"> > <source mode="connect" host="0.0.0.0" service="2445"/> > <protocol type="raw"/> > <target port="1"/> > </serial> > </devices> > > (side note, I wonder why the heck we try to connect to 0.0.0.0:2445 in the > example) > > I'd say substitute 0.0.0.0 with the IP address of your mgmt host. And use > unique port number per domain, otherwise you'd have to pass XML with > changed/unique port upon migration. > > Michal Michal, I suspect that Vasily mentioned channel block where virtio-serial setup belongs, not serial. For now, libvirt does not allow to add TCP connection inside. _______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
