Ho, Eric. On Tuesday, 04 June 2013 09:40:45 -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > >>> This is what I see in libvirtd.log: > >>> > >>> 2013-06-02 01:05:29.709+0000: 19289: info : libvirt version: 0.9.12 > Relatively old... > > This have to do with a bug when using libvirt on a 32-bit operating > > system? > > > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-November/thread.html#01048 > and since that thread discusses a fix that wasn't until commit 37a1012 > (0.10.0), you are correct that your version of libvirtd has a bug, and > that upgrading would fix things for you. Taking advantage of the new feature "multiarch" of Debian, I've migrated the VMHost to amd64 architecture and after that, I did not have this problem. Still, I see the <owner> </owner> and <group> </group> in the configuration file created after creating a pool once migrated to libvirt-bin amd64, have values that do not seem to correspond with UID and GID. This is normal? <pool type='logical'> <name>LVM</name> <uuid>6f24dd66-565d-53fa-9b21-41f6b69de757</uuid> <capacity unit='bytes'>979185434624</capacity> <allocation unit='bytes'>431644213248</allocation> <available unit='bytes'>547541221376</available> <source> <device path='/dev/md2'/> <name>vms</name> <format type='lvm2'/> </source> <target> <path>/dev/vms</path> <permissions> <mode>0700</mode> <owner>4294967295</owner> <group>4294967295</group> </permissions> </target> </pool> Thanks for your reply. Regards, Daniel -- Ing. Daniel Bareiro - GNU/Linux registered user #188.598 Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux with uptime: 16:43:32 up 25 days, 3:07, 12 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
