Re: libvirtd using 11GB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ah great, thanks!

Alex


On 16 April 2013 09:55, Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 16.04.2013 10:34, Alex Leonhardt wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Am new to this list, and have asked in #ovirt / ovirt-users list and
> they pointed me to here ... I've seen libvirtd using ~11 GB of resident
> memory after the host has been running for about 60+ days with about 40
> VMs running on it.
>
> The versions I'm currently running are :
>
> libvirt.x86_64         0.9.10-21.el6_3.7
> libvirt-client.x86_64  0.9.10-21.el6_3.7
> libvirt-lock-sanlock.x86_64
> libvirt-python.x86_64  0.9.10-21.el6_3.7
>
> I know I can just restart libvirtd and "all should be fine" (and
> hopefully I'll regain the 11GB of memory) - however, is there an updated
> version that maybe fixes a memory leak ??

Yes. John Ferlan did a great job in hunting memory leaks down. Most of
his fixes went to 1.0.3, some into 1.0.4 or even 1.0.2.

Michal



--
| RHCE | Sen Sys Engineer / Platform Architect | www.vcore.co | www.vsearchcloud.com |
_______________________________________________
libvirt-users mailing list
libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux