On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Rudy Godoy <rudy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
ok
I have a special requirement where i need guests from different networks (subnets) to need to communicate each other.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:09:53PM +0530, mallapadi niranjan wrote:That's correct behavior, because the networks are in different ranges
> Hi all,
>
> I have 3 guests (2-RHEL4 and 1 RHEL6) and have some issues regarding
> networking between them. The 2 RHEL4 system's use default bridge virbr0 and
> get ip's of range 192.168.122.0/24 (192.168.122.207, 192.168.122.167)
>
> I created another bridge (virbr1) with NAT forwarding (no dhcp). The
> network i choose was 192.168.100.0/24. And the third system (RHEL6) was
> assigned static ip-addres 192.168.100.101,
>
> >From the RHEL6 system which uses virbr1 is able to ping systems in
> 192.168.122.0/24 series , but guest systems in 192.168.122.0/24 are not
> able to ping RHEL6 system (in virbr1) network.
>
> >From the RHEL4 guests i am able to ping the gateway ip's (192.168.122.1,
> 192.168.100.1) , but not the RHEL6 system
>
they need to have a way to talk to each other, either via a gateway or
fixed routing.
ok
btw, Why do you need your hosts in separate networks?
I have a special requirement where i need guests from different networks (subnets) to need to communicate each other.
You may want to check this page on libvirt networking.
http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/VirtualNetworking
regards.
--
Rudy Godoy
http://stone-head.org
_______________________________________________
libvirt-users mailing list
libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
_______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
