On 02/10/2012 12:42 PM, Laine Stump wrote: > On 02/10/2012 01:45 PM, Eric Blake wrote: >> On 02/10/2012 05:43 AM, Székelyi Szabolcs wrote: >>> I've also noticed that the domain description passed to the hook script >>> doesn't contain the network device the host will be attached to (XPath: >>> /domain/devices/interface/target/@dev). >> This is a different question; right now it is a feature that we don't >> ever expose the actual network device through dumpxml to the user. But >> given your use case of a hook, we might have a reason to do it after >> all. Laine, thoughts? >> > > I don't recall why I chose to not expose it in a live dumpxml. I would > have to take some time rewinding to remember. It could be I just didn't > see a need for polluting public API at the time (and it's always easier > to add something in later than to take it away). That's my recollection as well - we didn't want to expose it if we didn't see a use; knowing full well that we could turn it on later (but could not turn it off later if it was on from the get-go). Sounds like we're in agreement then on turning it on. Is it best to do that by adding a new flags bit to dumpxml? -- Eric Blake eblake@xxxxxxxxxx +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
