On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:29:34PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > On 12/12/2013 04:19 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > >>> +++ b/autobuild.sh > >>> @@ -13,6 +13,12 @@ python setup.py build > >>> python setup.py test > >>> python setup.py install --root="$AUTOBUILD_INSTALL_ROOT" > >>> > >> > >> I haven't tested it, but shouldn't these lines ^^, and others similar > >> to them, be changed to "python2" in case my default python version is > >> 3? And if those "python2" are checked as well, it would be usable > >> even without python2. > > > > Yes, we should use python2 > > But does 'python2' exist in PATH on RHEL5? You have to be careful that > whatever solution you have works on systems with only one python > installed (whether that be old systems with python 2, or bleeding edge > systems with _only_ python 3). Yes, I checked RHEL5 for this. It has python2 in /usr/bin Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list