On 12/04/2013 08:42 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> Dan, do you have any thoughts on the best representation to use? Or is
>> Hu's original proposal of:
>>
>> <pvpanic ioport='0x505'/>
>
> I'm not a fan of doing a special case attribute for 'ioport' - this is
> something something that should be part of an <address> element, since
> ioport numbers are a generic addressing concept for many devices.
> eg ISA serial / parallel ports have IRQ / IO ports IIUC.
So something more like:
<pvpanic>
<address type='ioport' slot='0x505'/>
</pvpanic>
and introducing a new type='ioport' namespace into the <address> XML
since it is yet another numbering system for guest-visible addressing?
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list