[question] We can create two network of one same linux bridge or local ethernet. It is a bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We can create two network of one same linux bridge or local ethernet:
This is not harmful.
But I wonder should this case is allowed?  Why?

more detail as follow.

virsh # net-list --all
Name State Autostart Persistent
----------------------------------------------------------
br1 active yes yes
br2 active yes yes
default active yes yes

virsh # net-dumpxml br1
<network>
<name>br1</name>
<uuid>d5410814-1bea-b10d-04b8-9fbd3a1cfc65</uuid>
<forward mode='bridge'/>
<bridge name='br0' />
</network>

virsh # net-dumpxml br2
<network>
<name>br2</name>
<uuid>99f20705-57cd-da31-f193-d13af4158792</uuid>
<forward mode='bridge'/>
<bridge name='br0' />
</network>

virsh # net-list --all
Name State Autostart Persistent
----------------------------------------------------------
br0 active yes yes
br1 active yes yes
default active yes yes

virsh # net-dumpxml br0
<network>
<name>br0</name>
<uuid>a35c840a-9bdc-070d-43f5-8e834040aa42</uuid>
<forward dev='eth0' mode='bridge'>
<interface dev='eth0'/>
</forward>
</network>

virsh # net-dumpxml br1
<network>
<name>br1</name>
<uuid>f1c87b80-2dfc-2a71-3fb6-56ef83daf29a</uuid>
<forward dev='eth0' mode='bridge'>
<interface dev='eth0'/>
</forward>
</network>


--
Sheldon Feng(冯少合)<shaohef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
IBM Linux Technology Center

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list





[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]