Re: Can we make sc_copyright_check non-fatal?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/08/2013 03:48 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/08/2013 03:39 PM, Cole Robinson wrote:
>> The copyright date syntax check is a source of frustration for me:
>>
>> - It fails on old maint branches.
> 
> In general, 'make syntax-check' is NOT guaranteed to work on maint
> branches, nor is it worth trying to make it work there.  If anything,
> the best thing to do would be figuring out how to patch 'make
> syntax-check' to be a complete no-op on maint branches and only operate
> on a (descendant of) the master branch, precisely because out-of-order
> backports to maint branches makes it practically impossible to guarantee
> that we can consistently meet whatever style future development on the
> master branch decides is now in vogue.

I've attempted this now.

> 
>>
>> - It pokes into non git managed directories in $(srcdir).
> 
> That's probably a bug, and we should be able to fix it upstream in
> gnulib.  Syntax checkers should be able to be limited to just git files.
>  I guess the idea was that it checks non-managed files to ensure a
> tarball doesn't have generated files with a broken copyright date, but
> there's probably a better way to do that.

Still need to investigate here...

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]