On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 05:35:57PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 23/07/2013 16:14, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto: > >> > Perhaps the default could be specified in a configuration file (and the > >> > default should be the safe one). > > No, that is even worse because now the default is not predictable.. > > > > We simply default to host mode and if applications want to use the > > other mode they can configure the XML as desired. > > Can we just forbid mode='default' for iSCSI and force the user to > specify host vs. direct? That would mean that apps cannot simply configure a guest volume without first checking to find out what type of pool it is, and then specifying this extra arg for iSCSI. IMHO the value of the <volume> XML is that you don't have to know anything about the pool to be able to configure it - we're completely decoupled. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list