Re: [PATCH] Make locking more debuggable from logs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/22/2013 06:31 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 07/22/2013 07:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> I'm really inclined to say that anyone wanting todo lock debugging
>> should just use systemtap / dtrace todo it, since it is better in
>> every way.
> 
> I tend to agree on that point, with one caveat - we need to have good
> documentation on how to do systemtap debugging of libvirt, in order to
> make it easy to point someone to the steps they need to follow to
> benefit from it.  Our existing web pages on hacking are a bit sparse on
> this front.
> 

OK, thanks for your input.  My point was to enable this for people who
don't want to (or can't) use systemtap for various reasons, but I guess
nobody can be *that* lazy to do 'package_app install_command systemtap'
and then cleanup afterwards.

I like your idea of explaining systemtap debugging with libvirt on
wiki/documentation.  I'll try to combine it with additional systemtap
examples and put it all together somehow.  But I need you to check my
grammar, since it tends to be a longer text.

Thanks again and have a nice day,
Martin

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]