On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 02:13:59PM -0400, Dave Allan wrote: > > I've seen a bunch of interest in python3 [1,2,3]. Has anybody started > > thinking about python3 bindings for libvirt? > > I'm not going to do any work on it, but I have two requirements here > > - We should not end up maintaining two separate bindings. We want to > minimize the duplication of code to as great an extent as possible, > as close to zero extra overhead as possible in fact. The generator > will help, but there's still hand-written C code & python code that > we really don't want to be duplicating > > - We should be able to build both python2 & python3 at once. ie you > should not need to run ./configure --with-python=2|3, in order to > choose. We should detect both python2 & python3 at once & build > both if both are available. For my $.02, ack to both of those points. Dave -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list