On 19.07.2013 04:04, Doug Goldstein wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Dave Allan <dallan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I've seen a bunch of interest in python3 [1,2,3]. Has anybody started >> thinking about python3 bindings for libvirt? >> > > While not really answering your question, I would like to see the > build system a little more flexible with regards to Python binding > generation. Currently you have to configure libvirt and it will > generate bindings for the python it detects (or is supplied) and if > you want to change that you need to rebuild the entire source tree. > It'd be nice in the future to be able to build against multiple > Python's without having to reconfigure and rebuild. That's because python bindings need the client implementation. But I agree that it would be nice if one could just: make -C python to build the bindings. To answer Dave's question, I'm not really into python but isn't 2to3 enough? Michal -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list