Am 12.07.2013 03:36, schrieb Gao feng: > On 07/11/2013 07:58 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Am 11.07.2013 11:49, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange: >>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:44:48AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>>> Am 11.07.2013 11:42, schrieb Gao feng: >>>>> On 07/11/2013 03:18 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>>>>> This morning I've installed a wrapper around ip to show me the process tree upon ip link ... down is used. >>>>>> The log showed this: >>>>>> >>>>>> 769 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-udevd >>>>>> 17759 ? S 0:00 \_ /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-udevd >>>>>> 17764 ? S 0:00 \_ /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-udevd >>>>>> 17772 ? S 0:00 \_ /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-udevd >>>>>> 19477 ? S 0:00 | \_ /bin/bash /sbin/ifdown veth5 -o hotplug >>>>>> 19910 ? S 0:00 | \_ /sbin/ip link set dev veth5 down >>>>>> >>>>>> Now I have to urge to use a "Kantholz". ;-) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> hmmm... >>>>> >>>>> it's systemd... I have no idea now... :( >>>> >>>> TBH it is not systemd's fault. >>>> OpenSUSE's /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/77-network.rules did not white list veth* devices. >>>> Therefore systemd-udevd called ifup/down and other hotplug magic. >>> >>> Ah ha, that's a nice issue :-) I assume you've filed a bug against opensuse >>> to fix this ? Can you post a link to the bug here for the sake of archive >>> records. >> >> Sure: >> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829033 >> > > It's good news we know what causes veth device down. :) How does Fedora deal with veth devices? SUSE folks think that this is a more likely a libvirt issue and closed my bug report as invalid... Thanks, //richard -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list