Re: [PATCH] Put virt-sanlock-cleanup into section 8

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:17:37AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 07/03/2013 07:11 AM, Guido Günther wrote:
> >>
> >> Looks like daemon/Makefile.am needs the same tweak for libvirtd.8.
> > 
> > Since libvirtd.8.in in processed by sed and not pod2man it doesn't need
> > any additional tweaks. Or am I missing something?
> 
> Huh, you're right.  I just checked 'man virt-sanlock-cleanup' and 'man
> libvirtd' on my system, and libvirtd already claimed section 8.  I'm not
> sure what the difference is that libvirtd already did it right.
> 
> > 
> > It's only the reference inside virt-sanlock-cleanup's manpage that's
> > wrong. It states it's virt-sanlock-cleanup(1) while it's
> > virt-sanlock-cleanup(8).
> > 
> > So o.k. to push with only the s/indicates/indicated/ fixed?
> 
> Yes.

Pushed. Thanks.
 -- Guido

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list





[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]