On 05/24/2013 03:21 AM, yangdongsheng wrote: > Hi, [uggh; yet another victim of git's stupidity in using "In-reply-to: <y>" if you answer the 'git send-email' question incorrectly - just hit enter rather than filling in a response to that question] Would you mind resending this as a top-level thread, so that it gets properly threaded? My mail client split 0/2 and 2/2 into an old series, and 1/2 somewhere else. > I found some confusion in display of commad *virsh vcpuinfo domname* . > There is no diffrence between a cpu offline and a cpu online but not be set > for the affinity of vcpu, both are '-'. But users will find the difference of them > in using them for a same action (such as vcpupin) and be confused. I'm a bit worried about backward compatibility; if there are existing scripts that parse the output, will they be confused if we introduce a third symbol? Then again, offline host cpus are indeed a different beast than cpus that the guest has been assigned to, so I think we can make this change. > So, I think we should show the cpu in different state with different symbol. > > In this patchset, I introduce a symbol 'x' (maybe there is a better one :)) to display > the cpu is offline on host. > > Just like: > [root@yds-pc ~]# virsh vcpuinfo virt-tests-vm1 > VCPU: 0 > CPU: 0 > State: running > CPU time: 14.8s > CPU Affinity: y-xy > > > yangdongsheng (2): > tool/virsh-domain.c: Add a vshNodeGetCPUMap function to get cpumap of > host. > tool/virsh-domain.c: Fix the display of Affinity in function > cmdVcpuinfo. > > tools/virsh-domain.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list