On 05/10/2013 03:19 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On 04/30/2013 06:21 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 04/30/2013 09:18 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
>>> On 04/30/2013 10:42 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>>>> Adding support for new attribute 'websocket' in the '<graphics>'
>>>> element, the attribute value is the port to listen on with '-1'
>>>> meaning auto-allocation, '0' meaning no websockets.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>
>>>>
>>>> + if (websocket) {
>>>> + if (virStrToLong_i(websocket,
>>>> + NULL, 10,
>>>> + &def->data.vnc.websocket) < 0) {
>>>> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
>>>> + _("cannot parse vnc websocket port %s"), port);
>>>
>>> I think you meant websocket, not port for the string... it's a
>>> cut-n-paste error it seems.
>>>
>>> "port" will be VIR_FREE()'d already (or it may not have been found, so
>>> it's already NULL.
>>
>> But I like the proposal, and agree with the docs calling it out as 1.0.6
>> material.
>>
>> ACK with John's finding fixed.
>>
>
> I fixed what John found out and will push the series after I'll check
> one more thing. Sorry it took so long, I just found out about this mail
> since I wasn't one of the recipients.
>
I've found out there was missing call for virPortAllocatorRelease, plus
the number of comments made me send a v3 just to be sure. So rebased
version is available now [1].
Martin
[1] http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-May/msg00906.html
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list