On 04/22/2013 08:00 AM, Laine Stump wrote: > On 04/19/2013 11:25 AM, Laine Stump wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 04/18/2013 06:36 AM, Laine Stump wrote: Trimming a rather deep nesting... > > Okay, I misunderstood what you said - you weren't saying that you had > put num_queues in the <disk> element (obviously - if I was able to > retain enough context in my brain to remember the beginning of the > thread, I would have known that :-P), but were instead suggesting that I > had meant the num_queues should go in the <driver> subelement of <disk>. > You misunderstood me (so we're even :-). What I was saying was that it > should go in the <driver> subelement of <controller>. I still stand by > that opinion. Yes, I think a <driver> subelement of <controller> is a good idea, and like the compromise of 'queues' instead of 'num_queues' as completely avoiding the _ vs. camelCase question (at least for this issue). -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list