On 04/18/2013 10:54 AM, Osier Yang wrote: > On 18/04/13 16:42, Martin Kletzander wrote: >> On 04/18/2013 06:36 AM, Laine Stump wrote: >>> The rng schema for <controller> had been non-specific about which >>> types of controllers allowed which models, and also allowed the >>> num_queues attribute (since that hasn't been released yet, should we >>> rename it to "numQueues"?) >> Since there's still time (the commit with that is v1.0.4-65-gd4bf0a9), I >> think we should rename it ASAP since we are using camelCase for all the >> attribute names. >> >> Apart from that, the RNG with this patch is precise according to the >> documentation, so ACK. I'll try to send the numQueues patch to see what >> others think. > I guess you mean multiple queues support for virtio network? > Regardless of which style we will use finally, FYI, "num_queues" is > used for disk.. Personally I'm fine with either, because we already > use both across. > Yes, I meant the virtio-scsi num_queues. As we're trying not to use underscores in XML, I hope we can still switch it. I haven't found any other num_queues anywhere in the code. Could you point me to the commit that uses that? I'm sending the previously discussed patch in the meantime. Thanks, Martin -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list