Re: [PATCH 1/3] Remove support for old kernels lacking private devpts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/03/2013 11:12 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> We already reject compilation of LXC on RHEL 5 due to other
>> configure-time checks; is this something worth turning into an
>> additional configure test of whether a kernel is new enough, or are we
>> okay with just leaving it as a runtime test?
> 
> We can't ever check kernels during configure time, because you can't
> assume the build kernel matches the distro kernel. eg all Fedora builds
> are done in a host with a RHEL kernel

configure-time tests for an added constant that affect whether
compilation works are okay; but I can live with the fact that
improvements that aren't detected by the compiler aren't worth
hard-coding into a configure-time test (that is, runtime behavior of the
kernel running configure is not necessarily a good indicator; only
compile-time behavior is useful).

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]