Re: [PATCH 1/3] Remove support for old kernels lacking private devpts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 10:59:04AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/03/2013 10:02 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Early on kernel support for private devpts was not widespread,
> > so we had compatibiltiy codepaths. Such old kernels are not
> > seriously used for LXC these days, so the compat code can go
> > away
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  src/lxc/lxc_controller.c | 28 +++++++++-------------------
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> ACK.
> 
> We already reject compilation of LXC on RHEL 5 due to other
> configure-time checks; is this something worth turning into an
> additional configure test of whether a kernel is new enough, or are we
> okay with just leaving it as a runtime test?

We can't ever check kernels during configure time, because you can't
assume the build kernel matches the distro kernel. eg all Fedora builds
are done in a host with a RHEL kernel


Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]