Hi all I have 2 additional suggestions for a smoother build with 1.0.2 * I applied this change in my specfile: http://git.onelab.eu/?p=libvirt.git;a=commitdiff;h=184bc19ce855e1498f6775b711ea3d37808cd45c otherwise like I reported already, I end up with a plain libvirt rpm that requires libvirt-daemon-driver-interface that the build does not produce * this patch here http://git.onelab.eu/?p=libvirt.git;a=blob;f=libcurl-daemon.patch;h=a13198e7e65780b29e8b0dc4b497b4ade7614855;hb=2dbdf0bfe8ce97f475b7fe10d14b75c6fd475552 was required on f18 for me as well (this is similar to a change in src/Makefile.am that you guys had pointed me to in the first place) for that to kick in I also had to add 'autoreconf' before %configure in the specfile (I haven't tested with just he autoreconf, that might have been enough ?) IMHO I feel like this would make sense in mainstream, although I would not go as far as to claim that I captured the whole subtlety of that build :-) Thanks anyway for all the hints and help -- Thierry On Feb 20, 2013, at 4:57 PM, Jiri Denemark wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 15:43:57 -0600, Doug Goldstein wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 14:37:40 -0600, Doug Goldstein wrote: >>>> FWIW, I keep the patchset that I push into Gentoo now in a bit >>>> friendlier place to access: >>>> >>>> http://git.cardoe.com/?p=libvirt.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/v1.0.2-maint >>>> >>>> Due to Gentoo "supporting" each release of libvirt, we'll have a >>>> stable branch for every release that others are welcome to follow or >>>> look at or make suggestions to include. >>> >>> Doug, any reason for not having them in upstream libvirt git? We already >>> have maint branches for some releases, which happen to be the releases >>> present in Fedora and the main reason for that is the people maintaining >>> them are mostly interested in Fedora. But we encourage others that are >>> interested in having maint branches for other releases to do so. And the >>> nice thing about it is, that if an ugly bug that has been present in >>> libvirt for a long time may be fixed in all maint branches at once even >>> by people who are really interested in just some of them. >>> >>> Jirka >> >> No reason not to. I'll gladly add them if people would like that. > > Sure, just create v1.0.2-maint branch in upstream git repository and > cherry-pick patches there. It's possible git won't let you push the > branch, in which case let us know and we'll solve it. > > Jirka -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list