On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 15:43:57 -0600, Doug Goldstein wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 14:37:40 -0600, Doug Goldstein wrote: > >> FWIW, I keep the patchset that I push into Gentoo now in a bit > >> friendlier place to access: > >> > >> http://git.cardoe.com/?p=libvirt.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/v1.0.2-maint > >> > >> Due to Gentoo "supporting" each release of libvirt, we'll have a > >> stable branch for every release that others are welcome to follow or > >> look at or make suggestions to include. > > > > Doug, any reason for not having them in upstream libvirt git? We already > > have maint branches for some releases, which happen to be the releases > > present in Fedora and the main reason for that is the people maintaining > > them are mostly interested in Fedora. But we encourage others that are > > interested in having maint branches for other releases to do so. And the > > nice thing about it is, that if an ugly bug that has been present in > > libvirt for a long time may be fixed in all maint branches at once even > > by people who are really interested in just some of them. > > > > Jirka > > No reason not to. I'll gladly add them if people would like that. Sure, just create v1.0.2-maint branch in upstream git repository and cherry-pick patches there. It's possible git won't let you push the branch, in which case let us know and we'll solve it. Jirka -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list