Laine Stump wrote: > On 02/12/2013 07:24 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > >> On 02/12/2013 01:15 PM, Laine Stump wrote: >> >>> This makes it simpler to include the necessary system security driver >>> libraries for a particular system. For this patch, several existing >>> conditional sections from the Makfile were replaced; I'll later be >>> adding SECDRIVER_LIBS to libvirt_util_la_LIBADD, because vircommand.c >>> will be calling a function from $securitylib. >>> --- >>> Change from V1: >>> * initialize SECDRIVER_LIBS to empty >>> * allow both WITH_SECDRIVER_SELINUX and WITH_SECDRIVER_APPARMOR in the same build >>> >> Do you have a handy pointer for how to get apparmor headers installed >> for building with both libraries on Fedora? >> > > No idea. I just learned from Dan that it was at least theoretically > possible, and am counting on debian/ubuntu people to actually test this > bit, since I don't have any system that uses AppArmor. > I verified this builds with both apparmor and selinux enabled. Regards, Jim -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list