On 02/12/2013 07:24 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 02/12/2013 01:15 PM, Laine Stump wrote: >> This makes it simpler to include the necessary system security driver >> libraries for a particular system. For this patch, several existing >> conditional sections from the Makfile were replaced; I'll later be >> adding SECDRIVER_LIBS to libvirt_util_la_LIBADD, because vircommand.c >> will be calling a function from $securitylib. >> --- >> Change from V1: >> * initialize SECDRIVER_LIBS to empty >> * allow both WITH_SECDRIVER_SELINUX and WITH_SECDRIVER_APPARMOR in the same build > Do you have a handy pointer for how to get apparmor headers installed > for building with both libraries on Fedora? No idea. I just learned from Dan that it was at least theoretically possible, and am counting on debian/ubuntu people to actually test this bit, since I don't have any system that uses AppArmor. -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list