Re: persistent virtual networks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/31/13 16:42, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
I seem to remember that, if you use net-define, the network will be
persistent and, if you use net-create, the network will not be persistent.

I am now running libvirt-1.0.2 on Fedora 18.

When I use net-define a network from a template and then do a net-list
--all, the network is NOT marked as persistent.  If I restart
libvirtd.service, then the defined networks are persistent.

I noticed that the libvirt-1.0.2 announcement included:
- network: bridge: Fix regression when defining persistent networks
(Peter Krempa)

Do I have a bug to report?

I tested it again and it seems to work for me.

Could you please provide more info?

Steps to reproduce, the network XML and possibly debug logs would be great.


Thanks

Peter


--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]