Re: persistent virtual networks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Gene Czarcinski (gene@xxxxxxxxx):
> I seem to remember that, if you use net-define, the network will be
> persistent and, if you use net-create, the network will not be
> persistent.
> 
> I am now running libvirt-1.0.2 on Fedora 18.
> 
> When I use net-define a network from a template and then do a
> net-list --all, the network is NOT marked as persistent.  If I
> restart libvirtd.service, then the defined networks are persistent.
> 
> I noticed that the libvirt-1.0.2 announcement included:
> - network: bridge: Fix regression when defining persistent networks
> (Peter Krempa)
> 
> Do I have a bug to report?

Sounds like it, though I can confirm that the commit you cite above
fixed it for me, and 1.0.2 does the right thing here.

-serge

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]